निवृत्ते वाच्यसम्बन्धे प्रद्वेषो विधिगः परम् ।
अघटत्वं न सामान्यं किं न वा ह्यविशेषकम् ॥८०॥
nivṛtte vācyasambandhe pradveṣo vidhigaḥ param |
aghaṭatvaṃ na sāmānyaṃ kiṃ na vā hyaviśeṣakam
When the connection with the positive signified has been set aside, (your) aversion (to affirmation) yet resorts to affirmation after all; and is 'non-pot-ness' not (itself) a universal? Or why is it not (likewise) undifferentiating (and so useless)?